Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 270 Mont. 63 - State v. Weeks

State v. Weeks’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

164
cited by 164 later decisions
9
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

164 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 164 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably State v. Loh (1996), State v. Weaver (1998)

164 state decisions

8801995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Barker v. Wingo · Frye v. United States · United States v. Bonds · United States v. Chischilly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 164 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No evidence concerning the sexual conduct of the victim is admissible in prosecutions under this part except evidence of the victim’s past sexual conduct with the offender or evidence of specific instances of the victim’s sexual activity to show the origin of semen, pregnancy, or disease which is at issue in the prosecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “chargeable to the State); see also State v. Hembd (1992), 254 Mont. 407, 413 , 838 P.2d 412, 416 . However, institutional delay weighs less heavily against the State than does”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Failure to make a timely objection during trial constitutes a waiver of the objection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.