Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

270 N.C. 791

State v. King

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1967

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1967-06-20

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1968

2 state decisions

Relies on State v. Thomas · State v. Thomas · State v. Johnson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1967-06-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PeR CuRiam.

¶1The record affirmatively discloses that, despite the wording of the jury’s verdict, no bill of indictment has been returned against defendant charging him with the crime for which he was tried. “(A) person charged with the commission of a misdemeanor cannot be put on trial in the Superior Court upon the warrant of an inferior court unless he has been tried upon such warrant in the inferior court and has appealed from that court to the Superior Court.” State v. Thomas, 236 N.C. 454, 462, 73 S.E. 2d 283, 288. Accord, State v. Smith, 264 N.C. 575, 142 S.E. 2d 149; State v. Evans, 262 N.C. 492, 137 S.E. 2d 811; State v. Johnson, 251 N.C. 339, 111 S.E. 2d 297; State v. Ferguson, 243 N.C. 766, 92 S.E. 2d 197. The Superior Court of Haywood County, therefore, lacked jurisdiction of the action; defendant’s conviction and sentence are void. The judgment is arrested. The solicitor for the district may yet prosecute the defendant for the offense charged in the warrant upon the return of a true bill of indictment.

¶2Judgment arrested.

/270/nc/791 · .json · Public domain