270 N.J. Super. 274 - Wolfson v. Bonello’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2 district · 8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Southern Burlington County N.A.A.C.P. v. Township of Mount Laurel · Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc. v. Middletown Donut Corp. · Fellerman v. Bradley · Bowen v. Bowen · New Brunswick Savings Bank v. Markouski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An attachment may issue out of the Superior Court upon the application of any resident or nonresident plaintiff against the property, real and personal, of any defendant in any of the following instances: a. Where the facts would entitle plaintiff to an order of arrest before judgment in a civil action; b. Where the defendant absconds or is a nonresident of this State, and a summons cannot be served on him in this State; e. Where the cause of action existed against a decedent, which survives against his heirs, devisees, executors, administrators or trustees, and there is property in this State which by law is subject to plaintiffs claim; d. Where plaintiff has a claim of an equitable nature as to which a money judgment is demanded against the defendant, and the defendant absconds or is a nonresident and a summons cannot be served upon him in this State; or e. Where the defendant is a corporation created by the laws of another state but authorized to do business in this State and such other state authorizes attachments against New Jersey corporations authorized to do business in that state. [Ibid.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.