State v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “); see, e.g. , State v. Villanueva-Villanueva , 262 Or. App. 530 , 535, 325 P.3d 783 (2014) (concluding that erroneously admitted hearsay evidence was not harmless because”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 291 Or. App. 124 - State v. Roberts

2. “[W]e have considered the significance of challenged evidence in light of the presence or absence of other 'overwhelming evidence' of a defendant's guilt.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 291 Or. App. 124 - State v. Roberts

3. “there was no overwhelming evidence of guilt for defendant's convictions”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 291 Or. App. 124 - State v. Roberts