Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 270 S.C. 38 - Wayburn v. Smith

Wayburn v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2018

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

10019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McMichael v. McMichael · Cresswell v. Bank of Greenwood · Bean v. Bean · County of Abbeville v. Knox · Chavis v. Chavis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[IJntention is unavailing to avoid [a rule of law] where words of settled legal import are used and contrary principles are encountered. In such cases the intention will be conclusively presumed to accord with the established meaning of the words and to conform to the fixed rules of construction. Otherwise, there would be little stability of land titles.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]n construing a deed, 'the intention of the grantor must be ascertained and effectuated, unless that intention contravenes some well settled rule of law or public policy.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he deed must be construed as a whole and effect given to every part if it can be done consistently with the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.