Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

270 So. 2d 382

Mack v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 12, 1972

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1972-12-12

Relies on 222 So. 2d 769 - Mahone v. State · 261 So. 2d 561 - Dickenson v. State · 224 So. 2d 335 - Scarpati v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1972-12-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 1998

5 state decisions

20197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Defendant-appellant, Anthony Eugene Mack, seeks reversal of his conviction and sentence after being found guilty on the charge of carrying a concealed firearm. Two police officers stopped defendant after noticing a suspicious bulge in his right pocket. The officers seized a revolver from defendant and subsequently an information was filed charging him with carrying a concealed firearm in violation of F.S. § 790.01, F.S.A. Pursuant to the trial court’s adjudication defendant was sentenced to sixty (60) days in the Dade County Jail.

¶2On appeal it is contended that the trial judge deprived defendant of a fair trial by repeatedly displaying a lack of neutrality toward defendant. No objections, however, were made at trial to any of the alleged incidents of misconduct. Since the errors complained of by defendant are *383not fundamental they cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. Dickenson v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 261 So.2d 561; Scarpati v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 335; Mahone v. State, Fla.App.1969, 222 So.2d 769; Worthington v. State, Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 728.

¶3Accordingly, the judgment and sentence herein appealed is affirmed.

¶4Affirmed.

/270/so2d/382 · .json · Public domain