270 So. 2d 451 - State v. Collier’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 1984
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Benefield v. State · 265 So. 2d 695 - Earman v. State · 82 So. 2d 155 - Weiner v. Kelly · McLendon v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The officer may break open any outer door, inner door or window of a house, or any part of a house or anything therein, to execute the warrant, if after due notice of his authority and purpose he is refused admittance to said house or access to anything therein.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Yenke · Brown v. State“"At oral argument the state contended that because Officer Hill was invited into the apartment as a social guest, he had the right, after leaving and without further formality, to reenter the apartment with his fellow officers for purposes of executing the search warrant. This argument really begs the question because it assumes, without demonstrating, that the statute in question has an exception which covers such an entry. The statute does not have such exception and one cannot reasonably be found in the implication of the statute. It seems rather clear that Officer Hill's first entry into the apartment was authorized by the Colliers, but that such authorization did not relieve Officer Hill from the burdens of the statute after he left and returned not in the capacity of a social guest, but in his official capacity for the purpose of executing a search warrant."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Steffani · State v. Roman“"... hold the trial judge in error for failing to find the existence of such exceptional circumstances that would justify non-compliance with the statute."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Roman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.