White v. J. Weingarten, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 1975
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Peters v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. · Theunissen v. Guidry · Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co. · 19 La. App. 430 - Huber v. American Drug Stores · Joynes v. Valloft Dreaux
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"First, we noted that to avoid liability for injuries to a customer because of negligence in failing to discover an object or substance upon the floor which causes injury the storekeeper must make a preliminary or prima facie showing of a reasonably careful and thorough inspection where there was a potential danger to patrons. While the burden is on the plaintiff to show that such substance remained on the floor for a longer time than that in which it should have been discovered and removed, this burden on the plaintiff is subject to the requirement that the defendant first show in a preliminary way that the foreign substance was not discovered in spite of reasonably careful and frequent inspections."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.