Schoo v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
1 district · 29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Yeoman v. Com., Health Policy Bd. (1998), Farmland Mutual Insurance Co. v. Johnson (2001)
1 district · 29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Truax v. Corrigan · Terrace v. Thompson · State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Mirabal · Droege v. McInerney · Safety Building & Loan Co. v. Ecklar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is equally well established that the classification must be based upon some reasonable and substantial difference in kind, situation, or circumstance which bears a proper relation to the purpose of the Statute.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““From a revenue viewpoint, the only difference between the two groups is that the license tax is paid through different agencies. We do not think this single difference is sufficient to support a classification by which the Act is applicable to one class and inapplicable to the other. For this reason we think the Act is a special law where a general law might have been enacted and is in direct contravention of Section 59 of the Constitution.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The General Assembly shall not pass local or special acts concerning any of the following subjects, or for any of the following purposes, namely: ... [t]o regulate the limitation of civil or criminal causes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. B.L. v. Schuhmann
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.