Ex Parte Webb’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin))
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Kyles v. Whitley · Douglas v. People of State of California · Evitts v. Lucey · Ex Parte Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It has long been the rule that a conviction from which an appeal has been taken is final for the purposes of Article 11.07 when the clerk of the court of appeals issues that court’s mandate.”). For these reasons, capital post-conviction proceedings seem to have taken on the characteristics of a special appeal — albeit one in which resort may be made to evidence beyond the appellate record. All of this leads me to believe that the Legislature intended for our statutory post-conviction ha-beas corpus remedy in Texas death penalty cases to be really a kind of hybrid appeal rather than a true”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ex parte Alvarez“Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, this article establishes the procedures for an application for a writ of habeas corpus in which the applicant seeks relief from a judgment imposing a penalty of death.”); id. § 5(a)(1) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ex parte Alvarez“an appellate court's official notice, directed to the court below, advising it of the appellate court's decision and directing it to have the appellate court's judgment duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ramey v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.