Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 270 U.S. 438 - Barnette v. Wells Fargo Nevada Nat Bank of San Francisco

Barnette v. Wells Fargo Nevada Nat Bank of San Francisco’s Empirical Analysis

270 U.S. 438 · 1926

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 14 district · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2014 · most notably Gay v. Ruff (1934), Cabot Corp. v. AVX Corp. (2007)

21 federal appellate · 14 district · 20 state decisions — followed in 10 states

3001926193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Mansfield Ry Co v. Swan · Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Boyd · Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Martin · Southern Pac Co v. Bogert · Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. Karatz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * at the election of him whose act was induced by it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The purpose of the suit was to recover land and funds then in charge of the receiver of a court in Alaska [at that time a federal territorial court] which was created by laws of Congress, and derived its powers and authority from those laws.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “for or on account of any act done under color of his [the receiver’s] office.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.