Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

270 U.S. 44

70 L. Ed. 462

Docket (No. 3)

Docket No. 25,

Maryland v. Soper

Supreme Court of the United States

Argued December 7, 1925.

Decided February 1, 1926.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1926-02-01

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Stay/motion granted · 9–0 · Decided 1926-02-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions (9 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1971 · most notably Screws v. United States (1945), Stefanelli v. Minard (1951)

11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

100192619301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1PETITION POR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

¶2Original.

¶3Decided upon the authority of Maryland v. Soper (No. £), ante, p. 36.

¶4Messrs. Thos. H. Robinson, Attorney General of Maryland, and Herbert Levy, Assistant Attorney General of Maryland, for petitioner.

¶5*45Assistant to the Attorney General Donovan, with whom Solicitor General Mitchell was on the brief, for respondent.

¶6Mr. Chief Justice 'Taft

¶7delivered the opinion of the Court.

¶8This case is quite like that in No. 24, Original, just decided. It differs, in that here the indictment which was removed from the Circuit Court of Harford County, Maryland, to the District Court of the United States for Maryland was an indictment against E. Franklin Ely for perjury, in the inquiry made by the coroner into the circumstances of the death of Wenger, it being charged that when it was material whether he had seen Lawrence Wenger at the time he (Ely), as a government officer, lay concealed and hidden and watched the bringing of the still, he falsely stated he had not seen Wenger. In all other respects the proceedings were quite like those in the case just decided, and on the principles laid down in that case we must hold that there was no ground for removing the prosecution of Ely for perjury, and that the mandamus to require the remanding of the removal should be made absolute.

/270/us/44 · .json · Public domain