Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 270 U.S. 555 - Childers v. Beaver

Childers v. Beaver’s Empirical Analysis

270 U.S. 555 · 1926

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
8
cited 8 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
July 1983
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 6 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1983 · most notably McClanahan v. State Tax Commission of Arizona (1973), Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. United States (1943)

11 federal appellate · 6 district · 10 state decisions

1301926193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on M'Culloch v. State of Maryland · Slaughter-House Cases the Butchers' Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. The Crescent City Live · Knowlton v. Moore · Choate v. Trapp · State of Kansas v. State of Colorado

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It must be accepted as established that during the trust or restrictive period Congress has power to control lands within a state which have been duly allotted to Indians by the United States and thereafter conveyed through trust or restrictive patents. This is essential to the proper discharge of their duty to a dependent people; and the means or instrumentalities utilized therein cannot be subjected to taxation by the state without assent of the Federal government.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.