Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

270 U.S. 635

Docket No. 871.

Boyd v. Smythe

Supreme Court of the United States

Motion for supersedeas submitted March 22, 1926.

Decided April 12, 1926.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1926-04-12

1 counsel of record

Relies on Albert Shulthis v. D a McDougal · Hull v. Burr · Standard Oil Company of Indiana v. State of Missouri

Decided 1926-04-12

¶1Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa.

¶2Per Curiam.

¶3Application for a writ of super-sedeas and for leave to file a bond denied; motion for leave to amend the petition in error denied, and the writ of error dismissed, for want of jurisdiction, upon thé authority of Iowa C. R. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389, 393; Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674, 683; Rawlins v. Georgia, 201 U. S. 638; Burt v. Smith, 203 U. S. 129; Standard Oil Co. v. Missouri, 224 U. S. 270, 281; DeBearn v. Safe Deposit & Trust Company, 233 U. S. 24, 34; McDonald v. Oregon R. R. & Nav. Co., 233 U. S. 665, 669, 670; Gasquet v. Lapeyre, 242 U. S. 367, 369, 370; (2) McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U. S. 168, 181; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239, 243; Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526, 530; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, *636147.

¶4Mr. Lloyd L. Duke for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Benjamin J. Gibson and Neill Garrett for defendant in error. .

/270/us/635 · .json · Public domain