Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

270 U.S. 636

Docket No. 158.

Henry v. Irwin

Supreme Court of the United States

Submitted March 22, 1926.

Decided April 12, 1926.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1926-04-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1927

1 counsel of record

Relies on Albert Shulthis v. D a McDougal · Hull v. Burr · Western Union Telegraph Company v. Ann Arbor Railroad Company

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1926-04-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia.

¶2Mr. Randolph Henry for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Harvey B. Apperson and Charles D. Fox, Jr., for defendants in error.

¶3Per Curiam.

¶4Dismissed upon the authority of McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U. S. 168, 181; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239, 243; Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526, 530; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147; (2) California Powder Works v. Davis & Co., 151 U. S. 389, 393; Goar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468, 470; Consol. Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View R. R. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 599; Yazoo & Miss. Valley R. R. Co. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 303; Municipal Securities Corp. v. Kansas City, 246 U. S. 63; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271.

/270/us/636 · .json · Public domain