Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 270 Va. 138 - Com Transp. Com'R v. Glass

Com Transp. Com'R v. Glass’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Caplan v. Bogard · 6 Cal. 4th 738 - City of San Diego v. Neumann · Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. Webb · West v. Anderson · City of Virginia Beach v. Oakes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally, when a portion of a tract of land is taken by eminent domain, the owner is entitled to recover for the damage to the remainder of that tract, but not for damage to separate and independent tracts. An exception to the general rule is the so-called unity of lands doctrine. Under this doctrine, an owner may be compensated for damage to other tracts of land caused by a taking when three factors are present, viz., unity of use, physical unity, and unity of ownership.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"such a connection or relation of adaptation, convenience, and actual and permanent use, as to make the enjoyment of the parcel taken reasonably and substantially necessary to the enjoyment of the parcel left, in the most advantageous and profitable manner in the business for which it is used."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'it is for the jury to determine the ultimate question of unity, or its absence, and to determine whether that unity, and its loss by reason of the taking, ultimately affects the value of the remainder.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.