Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 270 Va. 325 - Townsend v. Com.

Townsend v. Com.’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

35 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Riner v. Com. · Breeden v. Commonwealth · Stockton v. Commonwealth · MacKall v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]n appellate review, this Court must give deference to the circuit court’s determination whether to exclude a prospective juror because that court was able to see and hear each member of the venire respond to questions posed. The circuit court is in a superior position to determine whether a prospective juror’s responses during voir dire indicate that the juror would be prevented from or impaired in performing the duties of a juror as required by the court’s instructions and the juror’s oath.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Public confidence in the integrity of the judicial system, as a ground for excluding a juror for cause, must be raised in the trial court or that issue is waived.... Any "implication” arising from ... prior decision[s] that the question of public confidence may be raised in any appeal when a motion to strike a juror for cause has been denied, regardless of whether it was properly raised below is expressly rejected. The trial court must be apprised of the basis upon which a public confidence objection to a juror is made and the other litigants given an opportunity to address the trial court on that matter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “a trial court's denial of a motion to strike a juror for cause `will not be disturbed on appeal unless there has been manifest error amounting to an abuse of discretion.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.