Bates v. McQueen’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on SIGNAL Corp. v. Keane Federal Systems, Inc. · TRUSTEES OF ASBURY CHURCH v. Taylor · Lee v. Mulford · Howerin Residental Sales Corp. v. Century Realty of Tidewater, Inc. · 316 Pa. Super. 139 - Cargill v. Northwestern National Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he arbitrators refused to postpone the hearing upon sufficient cause being shown therefor or refused to hear evidence material to the controversy or otherwise so conducted the hearing, contrary to the provisions of § 8.01-581.04, in such a way as to substantially prejudice the rights of a party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Meuse v. Henry“the failure to conduct 'the hearing' clearly intended by the terms of Code § 8.01-581.04, unless otherwise provided by an agreement, and by the provisions of Code § 8.01-581.010(4) was tantamount to no arbitration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Meuse v. Henry“[t]he parties are entitled to be heard, to present evidence material to the controversy and to cross-examine witnesses appearing at the hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Meuse v. Henry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.