Vredenburg v. Safety Devices Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 1997
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Halsey, Stuart & Co. v. Public Service Commission · Marshall v. Pinkham · Howard v. Howard · Welch v. Chippewa Sales Co. · Listman Mill Co. v. William Listman Milling Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ Where the issuance of a preliminary injunction would have the effect of granting all the relief that could be obtained by a final decree and would practically dispose of the whole case, ordinarily it will not be granted, unless complainant’s right to relief is clear.’ ” 43 C. J. S., Injunctions, p. 428, sec. 17.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.