Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 270 WIS 82 - Bachmann v. Bollig

Bachmann v. Bollig’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 1957
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Quady v. Sickl · Clark v. McCarthy · Konow v. Gruenwald · Whirry v. Rural Mutual Casualty Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When two cars proceeding upon a highway in opposite directions collide, the speed of either or both vehicles can only contribute to the accident in connection with some circumstance. For example, if the speed of the vehicle contributes to want of control or to its presence on the wrong side of the highway, it may be considered one of the causes of the collision. It is difficult to see, however, how the mere speed of a vehicle can be a factor in such an accident, provided both cars maintained their proper place on the highway, and provided the highway itself is wide enough to permit them to pass each other without interference.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.