Levy v. Rothfeld

¶1In an action for specific performance of an agreement for the sale of real property, defendant Charlotte Falk’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was denied. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Hagarty, Acting P. J., concurs but adheres to his views expressed in Joehl v. Tricarico (ante, p. 898); Nolan, J., dissents and votes to reverse and to grant the motion.