Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 Ala. 380 - Brooks v. Everett

Brooks v. Everett’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
September 1970
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Globe Iron Roofing & Corrugating Co. v. Thacher · Henry v. Ide · Morris v. Sartain · Berman v. Wreck-A-Pair Bldg. Co. · Whitaker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In our opinion, the assignments of error which challenge the decree of March 19, 1960, in so far as it orders the issuance of a temporary injunction present nothing for our review, for an appeal does not lie from an order or •decree granting a temporary injunction unless the record shows that the order or decree was made or purported to be made after a hearing as provided by § 1054, Title 7, Code 1940. (Citations Omitted) “The appellant’s remedy in regard to the temporary injunction was by way of motion to dissolve under the provisions of § 1052, Title 7, Code 1940, and if the ruling was adverse to appeal therefrom as provided by § 757, Title 7, Code 1940.” Brooks v. Everett, 271 Ala. 380, 384 , 124 So.2d 100, 104 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.