Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 Ark. 337 - Lipscomb v. State

Lipscomb v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2013

14 state decisions

601980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. State · Gruzen v. State · City of San Antonio v. Hamilton · Westbrook v. State · Bell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the defendant's fitness to proceed becomes an issue, it shall be determined by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.