Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 F.2d 450 - Simpson v. Thomas

Simpson v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

271 F.2d 450 · 1959

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
September 1995
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently September 1995

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

8019591960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. City of Greenville · Welsh v. United States · Field v. United States · 140 F. Supp. 711 - United States v. Pagan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a tax lien attaches to property, the United States becomes in a sense a co-owner with the taxpayer of the property to the extent of the lien. The taxpayer then ceases to have an unconditional right to obtain or retain possession of the property. ■ The substantive rights of the United States and of the taxpayer are in no sense dependent upon the nature of the immediate custody of the property or the identity of the custodian. If it appeared that money in the possession of a marshal had been stolen, no good reason appears why the law should require its return to the thief upon his discharge from custody. Nor do we see any reason why the United States Marshal may not recognize the United States as the owner of an interest in property in his custody.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “There are appropriate procedures by which the taxpayers here, if they dispute the claim that they owed taxes in the amounts collected, may contest them. These proceedings are not appropriate for that purpose. 9”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.