United States v. McKeever’s Empirical Analysis
271 F.2d 669 · 1959
Citation profile
78 federal appellate · 3 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 110 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably United States v. Borelli (1964), United States v. McMillan (1974)
78 federal appellate · 3 district · 13 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3500
Relies on United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. · Jencks v. United States · Palermo v. United States · Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company v. United States · Costello v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“need be only contemporaneously, not simultaneously made”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Due process is afforded defendants under the Jencks statute by the provision that there should be available for cross-examination of government witnesses any documents which contain recitals substantially in the words of the witness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“authenticity and correctness of the recording,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.