Wolfgang B. Klemperer v. Nathan C. Price’s Empirical Analysis
271 F.2d 743 · 1959
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently September 1991 · most notably Radio Steel & Mfg. Co. v. MTD Products, Inc. (1984), Alltrade, Inc. v. Uniweld Products, Inc. (1991)
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Field v. Knowles · Henry St. Pierre v. Draper M. Harvey, Draper M. Harvey v. Henry St. Pierre · Chittick v. Lyons · Fageol v. Midboe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It has been repeatedly held by this court, however, that all questions pertinent to the issue of priority of invention are before the court in considering an appeal from the Board of Patent Interferences and that it is not necessary for the successful party to an interference to file an appeal in order to preserve his right to argue any such question which has been decided adversely to him below.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A party to an interference dissatisfied with a decision of the board of patent interferences on the question of priority * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.