Schrager-Singer v. Attorney General of United States’s Empirical Analysis
271 F.2d 841 · 1959
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2008
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 95A · 22 U.S.C. § 1631A · 22 U.S.C. § 1631F
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(1) that the claimant is a person other than Bulgaria, Hungary, or Rumania, or a national thereof as defined in Executive Order 8389 of April 10, 1940, as amended; and “(2) that the claimant was the owner of such property immediately prior to its vesting, or is the successor in interest of such owner by inheritance, devise, or bequest.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Roboz v. Kennedy““Any person who has been domiciled in, or a subject, citizen or resident of a foreign country at any time on or since the effective date of this Order * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Roboz v. Kennedy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.