United States v. Abbell’s Empirical Analysis
271 F.3d 1286 · 2001
Citation profile
35 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2024 · most notably Cuellar v. United States (2008), United States v. Browne (2007)
35 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pierce v. Underwood · United States v. Aguilar · United States v. Calderon · United States v. Thomas · United States v. Matta-Ballesteros
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“juror's motivations and intentions are at issue.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A district court's finding on the question whether a juror has impermissibly refused to participate in the deliberation process is a finding of fact to which appropriate deference is due.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“without factual support, or for a legally irrelevant reason.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.