Luk v. Rosenberg’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1225 (§ 235 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1253 (§ 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1282 (§ 252 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1284 (§ 254 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Leng May Ma v. Barber · White v. Maryland · Department of Fish & Game v. Federal Power Commission · United States ex rel Paktorovics v. Murff · Wong Hing Fun v. Esperdy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(f) Crewmen alleging persecution. Any alien crewman refused a conditional landing permit or whose condi tional landing permit has been revoked who alleges that he cannot return to a Communist, Communist-dominated or Communist-occupied ■ country because of fear of persecution in that country on account of race, religion or political opinion shall be removed from the vessel or aircraft for interrogation. Following the interrogation, the district director having jurisdiction over the area where the alien crewman is located may in his discretion authorize parole of the alien crewman into the United States under the provisions of section 212(d) (5) of the Act. If parole is not authorized, the crewman shall be returned to the vessel or aircraft on which he arrived in the United States.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.