Oregon v. Norton’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2021
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 2701 (§ 2 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 25 U.S.C. § 2703 (§ 4 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 25 U.S.C. § 2719 (§ 20 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 25 U.S.C. § 714 (Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw) · 25 U.S.C. § 714E · 25 U.S.C. § 9 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Califano v. Sanders · United States v. Mead Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Secretary's proposed interpretation does not run against any Indian tribe ... [and] actually advances the trust relationship between the United States and the Native American people.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]n reviewing an agency's interpretation of a statute governing Indian tribes, the court must also consider canons of construction relevant to Indian law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“consider[ed] the applicable Indian law canon of construction in reviewing the Secretary's interpretation of the restored lands exception”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.