← 271 F. Supp. 2d 30 - Jackson v. Barnhart

271 F. Supp. 2d 30 - Jackson v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

cited by 12 later decisions

February 2017

most recently cited

12 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 1611 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 601 (§ 401 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Barnhart Commissioner of Social Security v. Walton · Marcus v. Califano · MaCgregor v. Bowen · Poulin v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“First, the claimant must not have engaged in “substantial gainful activity” since the onset of the impairment. Sec ond, the claimant must show that she has a severe impairment, that is, one that “significantly limits [the claimant’s] physical or mental ability to do basic work activities.” Third, if the impairment is severe, the Commissioner must determine whether the impairment meets or equals a listed impairment in Appendix 1 [to Subpart P of 20 C.F.R. Part 404], which leads to a conclusive presumption of disability and ends the inquiry. If the impairment is not one that the SSA presumes to be disabling, however, then the evaluation continues to a fourth step. At this stage, the Commissioner determines whether the claimant is incapable of performing work that she has done in the past. If incapable of the past work, then at the fifth step, the Commissioner must determine the claimant’s RFC [residual functional capacity] to see if she can perform other work that exists in substantial numbers in the national economy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Brown v. Barnhart
“Even if supported by substantial evidence ... the court will not uphold the Commissioner’s findings if the Commissioner reached them by applying an erroneous legal standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 753 F. Supp. 2d 42 - Banks v. Astrue
“such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 753 F. Supp. 2d 42 - Banks v. Astrue

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.