Crawford v. Blue’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1920 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Massachusetts has a substantial interest in securing public safety on its roads by suspending the operating privileges of drivers who default on [civil motor vehicle infractions].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Mendoza v. Garrett“objective facts either within the personal knowledge of an impartial government official or readily ascertainable by him”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Mendoza v. Garrett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.