Rodriguez-Guardado v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Zadvydas v. Davis · Department of the Interior and Bureau of Indian Affairss v. Klamath Water Users Protective Association · Jama v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement · Lozada v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Singh v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may be detained beyond the removal period and, if released, shall be subject to the terms of supervision in paragraph (3).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“have found delays attributable to an alien's legal challenges to a removal order to extend the 90-day removal period”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[s]eeking and securing a discretionary stay unquestionably prevents petitioner's removal”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.