Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 Ga. 416 - Semple v. State

Semple v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2025 · most notably Perry v. New Hampshire (2012), Perry v. New Hampshire (2012)

21 state decisions

1601999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Neil v. Biggers · Messer v. State · McClesky v. State · Thomason v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In such a case, the question is whether there was a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification. Gravitt v. State, 239 Ga. 709, 710 (4) ( 239 SE2d 149 ) (1977). Factors to be considered in answering that inquiry include: (1) the witness’s opportunity to view the accused at the time of the crime; (2) the witness’s degree of attention; (3) the accuracy of the witness’s prior description of the accused; (4) the witness’s level of certainty at the confrontation with the accused; and (5) the length of time between the crime and the confrontation. Thomason v. State, 268 Ga. 298, 303-304 (3) ( 486 SE2d 861 ) (1997). The ultimate question is, whether under the totality of the circumstances, the identification is reliable. Neil v. Biggers, supra at 199 ; Messer v. State, 247 Ga. 316, 321 (3) ( 276 SE2d 15 ) (1981).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the principle expressed in Neil v. Biggers , deals with the suggestiveness of an identification procedure used by police, and applies only to state action. [Cits.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.