Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 Ga. 419 - Pennie v. State

Pennie v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Huff v. State (2001), Brewner v. State (2017)

46 state decisions

2201999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Clark v. State · Hanifa v. State · Matthews v. State · Turpin v. Todd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here the juror revealed a possible connection to the victim and expressed concern that his verdict may pose a danger to him in the future, [the defendant] had an absolute right to be present at the meeting to assist trial counsel in effectively examining the juror. Under Hanifa, [the defendant’s] involuntary absence must be presumed prejudicial. 7”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'Thus, where the accused is involuntarily absent from the proceedings, the trial judge should have no communications with a juror about the case, except as to matters relating to the comfort and convenience of the jury.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The defendant has not only the right to be confronted with his witnesses, but he has also the right to be present, and see and hear, all the proceedings which are had against him on the trial before the Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.