Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 Ga. 464 - Cuzzort v. State

Cuzzort v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 188 Ga. App. 496 - Williams v. State · Lumpkin v. Johnson · Cobb County v. Campbell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “3.1 Method of Assignment. In multi-judge circuits, unless a majority of the judges in a circuit elect to adopt a different system, all actions, civil and criminal, shall be assigned by the clerk of each superior court according to a plan approved by such judges to the end that each judge is allocated an equal number of cases.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In Cuzzort, our Supreme Court explained further: The purpose of the assignment system in multi-judge circuits is to “prevent any person’s choosing the judge to whom an action is to be assigned.” USCR 3.1. ... In the Lookout Mountain Judicial Circuit, however, it is not the chief or other circuit judge who makes case assignments and sets the calendar but the district attorney. Because the district attorney is clearly within the category of persons directed to refrain from affecting case assignments under USCR 3.1, we find the method of case assignment employed in the Lookout Mountain Judicial Circuit violates the clear mandate of that rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.