Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 Ga. 591 - Busch v. State

Busch v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably State v. Marlowe (2003), 325 Ga. App. 267 - Martinez v. State (2013)

35 state decisions

2701999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Helvering v. Gregory · Hollowell v. Jove · Songer v. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Et Al. · Spivey v. State · Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Lipton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In construing a statute, our goal is to determine its legislative purpose. In this regard, a court must first focus on the statute's text. In order to discern the meaning of the words of a statute, the reader must look at the context in which the statute was written, remembering at all times that the meaning of a sentence may be more than that of the separate words, as a melody is more than the notes. If the words of a statute, however, are plain and capable of having but one meaning, and do not produce any absurd, impractical, or contradictory results, then this Court is bound to follow the meaning of those words. If, on the other hand, the words of the statute are ambiguous, then this Court must construe the statute, keeping in mind the purpose of the statute and "the old law, the evil, and the remedy." OCGA § 1-3-1(a).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.