Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 Ga. App. 565 - Long v. State

271 Ga. App. 565 - Long v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2022

2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

140200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Mallory v. State · In the Matter of Ivan H. Nathan · 174 Ga. App. 728 - Maddox v. State · 260 Ga. App. 661 - Baird v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Pursuant to the principle of statutory construction, "Expressum facit cessare tacitum" (if some things are expressly mentioned, the inference is stronger that those omitted were intended to be excluded) and its companion, the venerable principle, "Expressio unius est exclusio alterius" ("The express mention of one thing implies the exclusion of another"), the list of actions in [a statute] is presumed to exclude actions not specifically listed, and the omission of [additional maximum-minimum sentencing provisions] from [the statute] is regarded by the courts as deliberate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “it must appear that a complete enumeration or list normally would have included that which was omitted, thus making omission from the statute significant or indicative of legislative intent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “OCGA § 40-6-392 deals only with `[c]hemical tests for alcohol or drugs in blood'; it does not concern any other tests for sobriety, including the alco-sensor test and field sobriety tests”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.