271 Ill. App. 3d 17 - People v. Rega’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2023
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 165 Ill. 2d 305 - People v. Lewis · 109 Ill. 2d 449 - People v. Hattery · 27 Ill. 2d 398 - The People v. Sprinkle · 24 Ill. 2d 93 - The PEOPLE v. Santucci · People v. Marino
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘It is the judge’s duty to see that justice is done, and where justice is liable to fail because a certain fact has not been developed or a certain line of inquiry has not been pursued it is his duty to interpose and either by suggestions to counsel or an examination conducted by himself avoid the miscarriage of justice, but in so doing he must not forget the function of the judge and assume that of the advocate.’ ” Rega, 271 Ill. App. 3d at 23 , quoting People v. Lurie, 276 Ill. 630, 641 , 115 N.E. 130 (1917).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“fair and impartial manner, without showing prejudice or bias against either party.” People v. Gilbert, 12 Ill. 2d 410, 415 , 147 N.E.2d 44, 47 (1957). The line of judicial propriety”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.