Lockert v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2008
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. United States · Bordenkircher v. Hayes · Neeley v. State · Williams v. State · Carroll v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““With respect to petitioner’s claim that he was not advised that by pleading guilty he would be admitting the truth of the facts contained within the indictment, once again the trial court’s advisement failed to comply literally with the language in the statute, however, we do not find it to be reversible error in this case. In establishing a factual basis for the plea, the State introduced into evidence a statement made by the petitioner subsequent to his arrest. In his statement the petitioner admitted to having been a participant in the felony murder with which he was charged. At the guilty plea hearing, in response to questions by the trial judge, the petitioner stated that the facts contained in the statement were true. Inasmuch as the truth of the statement was acknowledged, and inasmuch as the facts therein related constituted the crime charged and to which the petitioner entered his guilty plea, we find that the trial court’s advisement under the circumstances of this case, sufficiently conformed with § 35-4.1-1-3 as to constitute an adequate inquiry into the voluntariness of the plea.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dolan v. State“(4) That I would request and do hereby request a continuance in Cause No. 74-108, that being a criminal action alleging the offense of murder while perpetrating a kidnapping. (5) That I would further waive all rights and do hereby knowingly waive all rights to a trial setting under Criminal Rule of Procedure # 4.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lockert v. State“... it is not material who gives the advisements, so long as the record of the guilty-plea hearing reflects that 'the defendant was advised of and understood the substance of his rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hutchinson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.