Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

271 Kan. 1033

In re Brock

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 2001

North Dakota Supreme Court · decided 2001-08-14

Cited by 106 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably State v. Brown (2012), State v. Davis (2003)

106 state decisions

Relies on In re Brock

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-08-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1On January 26, 2001, this court suspended the respondent, Rebecca D. Brock, from the practice of law in Kansas for a period of 1 year. See In re Brock, 270 Kan. 635, 17 P.3d 361 (2001). The suspension was made retroactive to January 1, 2000, when the respondent had voluntarily ceased to practice law. Before reinstatement, the respondent was required to pay the costs of the disciplinary action and to resolve any CLE or attorney license fee problems.

¶2The Disciplinary Administrator has filed a report verifying that the respondent has fully complied with the conditions imposed upon her by this court.

¶3This court, having reviewed the files and the recommendation of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that respondent, Rebecca D. Brock, should be reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Kansas.

¶4It Is Therefore Ordered that the respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Kansas as of the date of this order.

¶5It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports.

/271/kan/1033 · .json · Public domain