Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 Kan. 565 - State v. Amos

State v. Amos’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Federal Trade Commission v. Textile & Apparel Group · State v. Gregory · State v. Robinson · State v. Mason · State v. Murillo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The State need not charge aiding and abetting in the charging document in order to pursue an aiding and abetting theory at trial. If, from the totality of the evidence, a jury reasonably could conclude that the defendant aided and abetted another in the commission of the crime, then it is appropriate to instruct the jury on aiding and abetting.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.