State v. Lessley’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
August 2014
most recently cited
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Wilkins · State v. Conley · State v. Gideon · State v. Smallwood · State v. Mincey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged, the standard of review is whether, after review of all the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the appellate court is convinced that a rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. [Citation omitted.]” State v. Lessley, 271 Kan. 780, 785 , 26 P.3d 620 (2001).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.