Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 Kan. 892 - State v. Davis

State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Sperry · State v. Duke · United States v. Condon · State v. Davis · 29 Kan. App. 2d 75 - Edwards v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[A] defendant must establish that: (1) counsel’s performance was deficient, which means counsel made errors so serious that counsel’s performance was less than that guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to tire United States Constitution, and (2) die deficient performance prejudiced die defense, which requires a showing of a reasonable probability that but for counsel’s errors, die result of die proceeding would have been different.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.