Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 Mont. 61 - Knudson v. McDunn

Knudson v. McDunn’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Davis v. Westphal (2017), Sweet Grass Farms, Ltd. v. Board of County Commissioners (2000)

38 state decisions

1601995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Porter v. K & S PARTNERSHIP · Boyer v. Karagacin · Marta v. Smith · J.M. v. Montana High School Ass'n · Awareness Group v. Board of Trustees of School District No. 4

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) when it appears that the applicant is entitled to the relief demanded and the relief or any part of the relief consists in restraining the commission or continuance of the act complained of, either for a limited period or perpetually; (2) when it appears that the commission or continuance of some act during the litigation would produce a great or irreparable injury to the applicant; (3) when it appears during the litigation that the adverse party is doing or threatens or is about to do or is procuring or suffering to be done some act in violation of the applicant’s rights, respecting the subject of the action, and tending to render the judgment ineffectual ....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “During a show cause hearing on a preliminary injunction, the district court should restrict itself to determining whether the applicant has made a sufficient case to warrant preserving a right in status quo until a trial on the merits can be had.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “no discretion is involved, and therefore, we review the district court's conclusions of law to determine whether the district court's interpretation of the law is correct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.