Gasque v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 76 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently November 1989 · most notably State v. Greene (1974), State v. Williams (1969)
6 federal appellate · 76 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gideon v. Wainwright · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Pointer v. Texas · Hamilton v. Alabama
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . The record does not show any objection to this testimony, but only an exception. This is said in 1 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, § 1: ‘The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court on appeal is limited to questions of law or legal inference, which, ordinarily, must be presented by objections duly entered and exceptions duly taken to the rulings of the lower court.’ This is said in Conrad v. Conrad, supra [ 252 N.C. 412 , 113 S.E. 2d 912 (1960)] : ‘Error can only be asserted by an exception taken at an appropriate time and in an appropriate manner. Errors based on rulings made during the trial must ordinarily be called to the attention of the court by an objection taken when the ruling is made. G.S. 1-206.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hedrick““The exception to proof of other acts of the same nature cannot be sustained. They are competent in corroboration. . . .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.