¶1The defendant’s only exception is to the admission of the defendant’s photograph during a line-up, alleging this to be a violation of his constitutional right against self-incrimination.
¶2The same question of law is presented and determined in the case of State v. McKissick, ante, 500, and it would serve no useful purpose to repeat the rulings therein made.
¶3Upon the authority of that case, the defendant’s exception is overruled.
¶4No error.