State v. Vasquez’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably State v. Robinson (2006), State v. Archie (2007)
48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Monge v. California · Monge v. California · State v. Marshall · Soto v. State · State v. Van
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he judgment of the court in any action taken pursuant to section 29-2315.01 shall not be reversed nor in any manner affected when the defendant in the trial court has been placed legally in jeopardy . . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hense · State v. Head“application of § 29-2316 turns on whether the defendant has been placed in jeopardy by the trial court, not by whether the Double Jeopardy Clause bars further action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hense“chose to exempt misdemeanor sentences from excessive leniency review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stafford
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.