Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 271 NW2D 738 - Recker v. Gustafson

Recker v. Gustafson’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2010

21 state decisions

12019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Johnson · Qualley v. Chrysler Credit Corp. · In Re the Marriage of Novak · Stover v. Central Broadcasting Company · Helland v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We deem application for post-trial relief, such as applications under rule 179(b), to be waived and abandoned when the moving party files a notice of appeal. In re Marriage of Novak, 220 N.W.2d 592, 596 (Iowa 1974); Kent Feeds, Inc. v. Stanwood Feed & Grain Co., 186 N.W.2d 593, 597 (Iowa 1971); Pedersen v. Thom, 258 Iowa 250, 252 , 137 N.W.2d 588, 589 (1965); State v. Johnson, 257 Iowa 1052, 1063 , 135 N.W.2d 518, 525 (1965).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A final judgment or decision is one that finally adjudicates the rights of the parties, and it must put it beyond the power of the court which made it to place the parties in their original positions. It is a determination which may be enforced by execution or in some similar manner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.