Interstate Tea Co. v. Alt.’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2007
5 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kaumagraph Co. v. . Stampagraph Co. · Edgecomb v. Edmonston · Berckhemer v. . Empire Carrying Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“from establishing any trade relationship in competition with the plaintiff with customers of the plaintiff served by the defendant or whose names were learned by him during his employment by the plaintiff....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.